610
C
PayerScore · Health insurer · Alabama
Cigna, Alabama
300 to 850 · lower is worse for providers · 575 = median payer conduct
74%
providers win their IDR disputes
538%
median award vs the payer's QPA
39%
payer default / non-response rate
1,128
resolved federal IDR disputes
Contracted-rate position: across the codes we can compare, this payer pays about 100% of the local peer median (documented public rate data). Lower means it pays providers less than the local market.
In Alabama, Cigna sits near the middle of payer conduct. Providers win 74% of resolved federal IDR disputes against it here, at a median award of 538% of the payer's own qualifying payment amount.
See the full breakdown
The interactive Payer Explorer shows the code-by-code detail, the dispute history, and where your own book sits against Cigna. It is a documented reimbursement opportunity, modeled not guaranteed.
Score your own rates free Open the Payer ExplorerShare this grade
One tap puts the number in front of every provider who deals with Cigna.
See how your own payers grade
Get the PayerScore for the plans on your own contracts, and a quarterly note when any grade moves in the federal record.
About this grade. PayerScore is a modeled index and an opinion derived from disclosed public data, not a statement of fact about the payer's conduct. It is computed by deterministic method (v1.0.0) from public federal IDR dispute records (CMS Public Use File) and documented public rate positions vs the local peer median. These are federal independent-dispute-resolution records, not court judgments or litigation. Figures are modeled, not guaranteed. See the methodology. A payer may request a correction at corrections@reddenda.com.