682
B
PayerScore · Health insurer · Minnesota
Cigna, Minnesota
300 to 850 · lower is worse for providers · 575 = median payer conduct
84%
providers win their IDR disputes
243%
median award vs the payer's QPA
24%
payer default / non-response rate
50
resolved federal IDR disputes
Contracted-rate position: across the codes we can compare, this payer pays about 102% of the local peer median (documented public rate data). Lower means it pays providers less than the local market.
In Minnesota, Cigna treats providers better than most. Providers win 84% of resolved federal IDR disputes against it here, at a median award of 243% of the payer's own qualifying payment amount.
See the full breakdown
The interactive Payer Explorer shows the code-by-code detail, the dispute history, and where your own book sits against Cigna. It is a documented reimbursement opportunity, modeled not guaranteed.
Score your own rates free Open the Payer ExplorerShare this grade
One tap puts the number in front of every provider who deals with Cigna.
See how your own payers grade
Get the PayerScore for the plans on your own contracts, and a quarterly note when any grade moves in the federal record.
About this grade. PayerScore is a modeled index and an opinion derived from disclosed public data, not a statement of fact about the payer's conduct. It is computed by deterministic method (v1.0.0) from public federal IDR dispute records (CMS Public Use File) and documented public rate positions vs the local peer median. These are federal independent-dispute-resolution records, not court judgments or litigation. Figures are modeled, not guaranteed. See the methodology. A payer may request a correction at corrections@reddenda.com.